Documentation Standards
DraftStatus: Draft
Version: 0.1.0
Last Updated: 2026-05-18
Owner: Axodus Core
Purpose
This page summarizes public documentation standards for Axodus contributors and reviewers.
Language
Final public documentation must be written in English.
Structure
Major nucleus pages should include status, version, last updated date, owner, purpose, scope, ecosystem role, documentation map, and risk considerations.
Tone
Documentation should be professional, transparent, technical, and operationally clear. It must avoid hype, vague crypto marketing, unsupported partnership claims, fake audit claims, and unrealistic financial expectations.
Source Boundaries
Public documentation lives under /docs. Internal semantic memory under .knowledge, internal protocols under .instructions, and legacy or historical material under legacy/ must not be treated as canonical public documentation unless intentionally reviewed and migrated.
Token Language
Use $Neurons as the canonical public documentation name. Use NEURONS only when referencing the technical ERC-20 symbol.
Risk Language
Sensitive pages must include appropriate risk context and must not promise guaranteed APY, yield, profit, ROI, payout, token appreciation, strategy performance, or risk-free outcomes.
Minimum Substantive Standard
A public page should state its purpose and scope, identify the relevant actors and authority, explain applicable inputs, outputs, process or components, name dependencies, and distinguish current status from future direction. It must also state material limitations, public/private boundaries, and failure or exception behavior where those affect interpretation.
Not every field applies to every page. A glossary or index may remain concise when its navigational function is explicit. An architecture or lifecycle page, however, is incomplete if it only lists concepts without describing components, handoffs, state, or unresolved interfaces.
When evidence is unavailable, authors document the gap and route it to the appropriate backlog. They do not replace missing evidence with stronger prose.
